Search DNSSEC Blog

DNSSEC NEWSFLASH

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

BIND 9.7.0a3 is now available

Overview:

This is a technology preview of new functionality to be
included in BIND 9.7.0. Not all new functionality is in
place. APIs and configuration syntax are not yet frozen.

BIND 9.7 includes a number of changes from BIND 9.6 and earlier
releases. Most are intended to simplify DNSSEC configuration
and operation.

New features include:

- Simplified configuration of DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV).
- Simplified configuration of Dynamic DNS, using the "ddns-confgen"
command line tool or the "local" update-policy option. (As a side
effect, this also makes it easier to configure automatic zone
re-signing.)
- New named option "attach-cache" that allows multiple views to
share a single cache.
- DNS rebinding attack prevention.
- New default values for dnssec-keygen parameters.
- Support for RFC 5011 automated trust anchor maintenance
(see README.rfc5011 for additional details).
- Smart signing: simplified tools for zone signing and key
maintenance.
- The "statistics-channels" option is now available on Windows.
- A new DNSSEC-aware libdns API for use by non-BIND9 applications
(see README.libdns for details).
- On some platforms, named and other binaries can now print out
a stack backtrace an assertion failure, to aid in debugging.
- A "tools only" installation mode on Windows, which only installs
dig, host, nslookup and nsupdate.
- Improved PKCS#11 support, including Keyper support (see
README.pkcs11 for additional details).

Additional features planned but not included in this alpha release:

- Fully automatic signing of zones by "named"
- Additional PKCS#11 support, including multiple OpenSSL engines

BIND 9.7.0a3 can be downloaded from: ftp.isc.org

1 comment:

  1. Can anyone recommend the best Remote Desktop program for a small IT service company like mine? Does anyone use Kaseya.com or GFI.com? How do they compare to these guys I found recently: N-able N-central configuration management
    ? What is your best take in cost vs performance among those three? I need a good advice please... Thanks in advance!

    ReplyDelete